Quantitative Verification Audit ● Live Verified: As of 2026-09-15

Institutional Strategy Tear Sheet

Audited performance, factor risk decomposition, predictive information depth, and conformal bounds reliability for the Hedge Zero / SpyAlt quantitative overlay.

Download PDF Tear Sheet ↗
Audit Period: Trailing 252 Trading Days (thru 2026-09-15) Universe: US Equities (Top 500, ADV > $10,000,000) Benchmark: S&P 500 (SPY) Friction Model: 5.0 bps Net Transaction Deduction
Sortino Ratio
+1.86 Edge
3.38
SPY Benchmark: 1.52
Evaluates return purely per unit of bad (downside) volatility. Upside drift is unpenalized.
Max Drawdown
-51% Truncation
-4.4%
SPY Benchmark: -8.9%
Peak-to-trough capital decline truncated via automated SGOV tactical cash deployment.
Capture Ratio
88.9% / 69.1%
+19.8%
Up-Market: 88.9% · Down-Market: 69.1%
Positive asymmetric capture spread: participates in bull runs while dampening severe drawdowns.
Conformal Reliability
1.2% Calib Gap
81.2%
Target: 80.0% P10–P90 Band
Out-of-sample empirical coverage across 7,839+ forward projections. Validated floor guarantee.
Factor & Risk-Adjusted Performance Attribution
Net of 5.0 bps Round-Trip Friction
Quantitative Metric Hedge Zero Strategy S&P 500 (SPY) Institutional Differential Econometric Interpretation
Sortino Ratio 3.38 1.52 +1.86 pts Superior risk-adjusted compounding without penalizing upside volatility spikes.
Annualized Sharpe Ratio 2.34 1.05 +1.29 pts Net risk-adjusted return over 4.5% Treasury risk-free hurdle.
Calmar Ratio 6.74 2.06 +4.68x Annualized return generated per unit of maximum historical drawdown.
Maximum Drawdown -4.4% -8.9% +4.5% (Shielded) Capital preservation driven by automated SGOV deployment in declining regimes.
Market Beta (βSPY) 0.76 1.00 -0.24 (Controlled) Scales down dynamically: ~0.85 in Active Offense, ≤0.25 in Capital Defense.
Annualized Idiosyncratic Alpha (α) +14.9% 0.0% +14.9% Pure idiosyncratic residual return unexplainable by passive broad-market exposure.
5-Day Directional Concordance 56.8% 50.0% ++6.8% Edge Cross-sectional hit rate on high-conviction candidate sieve. (Benchmark: coin flip).
Payoff Profit Factor 1.20 1.00 ++0.20 Ratio Cumulative gains from winning positions exceed losses from losing positions by 19%.
Conformal Interval Calibration 81.2% Unbounded 1.2% Error Empirical P10–P90 coverage matches 80.0% mathematical expectation with 1.2% gap.
The Quantitative Sieve & Alpha Funnel
How Noise is Systematically Eliminated
STAGE 01 · UNIVERSE
500+ Liquid Assets
Filtered by strict ADV > $10,000,000 liquidity gate and delisting blacklist to ensure zero market impact.
STAGE 02 · MULTI-HORIZON
Neural Consensus
Evaluates term structures across 2d, 5d, 10d, and 20d horizons. Eliminates 80% of contradictory signals.
STAGE 03 · CONVICTION SIEVE
Survival & Conflict Gating
Filters for Survival ≥ 0.5 and Conflict ≤ 0.2. Lifts directional hit rate to 56.8% and Profit Factor to 1.20.
STAGE 04 · HRP ALLOCATION
Concentrated Top 5 + Shield
Sizes top 5 picks via Hierarchical Risk Parity. Deploys up to 75% SGOV cash shield in declining regimes.

Institutional Context & Methodological Caveats

  • Execution Friction: All metrics incorporate a mandatory 5.0 bps transaction deduction and half-spread per rebalance. Realized fills depend on execution venue and order routing.
  • Regime Transition Lag: The Hidden Markov Model classifies macro regimes probabilistically; sudden flash crashes or overnight geopolitical gap-downs can take 24–48 hours to fully register in posture.
  • Out-of-Sample Integrity: Forecast evaluations in DuckDB are recorded strictly prior to market open with forward-verified actuals, preventing lookahead bias.
  • Capacity Constraints: The strategy capacity is conservatively modeled at $150M – $250M based on a maximum 1.0% volume participation ceiling across candidate assets.
  • No Guaranteed Floor: While conformal intervals achieve 81.2% empirical calibration on an 80.0% nominal band, extreme black-swan liquidity shocks can exceed statistical boundaries.
  • Turnover Expectations: Average holding horizon of ~16.5 days results in annualized portfolio turnover of ~185%, requiring efficient prime brokerage execution.